Feet rating stats (171 total votes)
105
5 stars
5 stars
29
4 stars
4 stars
28
3 stars
3 stars
4
2 stars
2 stars
5
1 star
1 star
| Rating: | (4.78/5) |
| You Rated: | (click to rate) |
| Email me on new: Pictures Wall Posts | |
Gallery Settings
more info4 pictures were removed from this gallery.
Suggestions from Clips4Sale:
People who liked Belicia Steele's feet, also liked:
Comment section
The comment section is intended for intellectual discussions over symmetry and aesthetics.
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
Insultive/bigoted/sexually explicit comments and political discussions are prohibited.
Describing of fantasies is prohibited. Videos/links must follow the same standards as photos.
In short - stay classy ;)
* Enforced by The Guild more info
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
Reported: Adult Content
2016-01-05 18:15:05 A luscious woman in a luscious bath! @smoothsole. #bath.
|
|
2016-01-05 18:21:51 And Luscious Feets!
|
|
Reported: Adult Content
2014-12-27 10:33:23 Delicious HOT PED'ed Babe alert.....
|
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-12-27 23:33:19 "http://pics.wikifeet.com/Belicia-Steele-Feet-1553811"...removed for adult content...no genitals showing/no breast nipples...just HOT feet & legs/beautiful BOD/HOT face...I don't get it....
It was not blatant degrading adult content....there is far far more "in-your-face" true adult content pics on these sites that have not been removed and other pics showing THE SAME amount of BODY content that this pic does.... Please restore the pic....it was a great one within the rules/The Guild's content requirements.... If "http://pics.wikifeet.com/Belicia-Steele-Feet-1553811" was adult content then so are all of the rest of the pics shown… |
|
User rated ★★★★★(beautiful feet)
|
2014-12-27 23:43:53 I reloaded it....
|
|
2014-12-27 23:56:46 @Legend- It's because she's 'nude' and has a little sideboob showing, probably, and because of the 'double-standard' for porn stars. I wouldn't call it Adult Content, but I'm betting the site Admin/Owner would.
|
|
2014-12-28 00:13:13 #1554400 confirmed AC again.
|
|
2014-12-28 00:35:33 And unreported again (not by me)
|
|
2014-12-28 02:48:07 I'm partial to the pic because I think she HOT but, taking a step back, I can see how Admin/ Owner could think it is adult content.
There are however, tons of these "type" nude shots ("classy" no genitals showing/no breast nipples) tons of our WikiFeet pages that are accepted...I never really thought about them before I posted this one... I DO NOT WANT TO BREAK THE RULES SET BY THE GUILD...Believe it or not, I enjoy the site too much to do anything that would F*CK it up..... |
|
User rated ★★★(ok feet)
|
2014-12-28 02:54:38 It's that different set of standards for PS that is unpublished on the site.
|
|
2014-12-28 02:56:45 It's not A/C from where I sit, even for a PS, and I agree there are *many* such photos on the site. However, keep in mind that pr0n used to be allowed here, so check the upload dates; some have been here for many years and just not 'discovered' and reported in the cleanup process.
|
|
2014-12-28 05:25:21 Understand all...I will abide by the rules....too many HOTTIES here on WikiFeet for me to screw this up....
|
